Four ontological dimensions generate two derived properties: F = S·A (cohesive force — control) and E = I×R (resultant field — structural fear, not emotional). Move the sliders and observe how the configuration changes.
Configuration
Derived properties
Not an emotion — the background condition from which the ego operates
Configuration map
Prototypical patterns — load configuration
Identified pattern
Structural similarity: 100%
The ego operates in a stable and coherent manner. Consolidated identity without excessive rigidity.
Active strategies
focus, adaptation, cooperation
Clinical note
Baseline configuration. F and E in functional balance. Good therapeutic starting point.
Model predictions
P1 — Loss of control
F↓, E persists → survival reaction proportional to perceived threat
Active zone
P2 — Loss of meaning
E↓, F persists → rigidity without direction, control for its own sake
Active zone
P3 — Structural crisis
F↓, E↓ simultaneous → depersonalization, deep existential crisis
Active zone
Methodological disclaimer
This visualizer does not constitute a diagnostic or clinical taxonomy. It is a heuristic demo for exploring prototypical structural patterns within a dynamic continuum. Values (0–100) are relative and conceptual — they do not represent empirical measurements or validated scales. The patterns shown are discretized prototypical zones, not essential categories of the self. It may be used as a pedagogical resource by professionals in reflective contexts, but does not constitute a psychometric clinical assessment tool.
Theoretical reference: Molina, H. (2026). The Anatomy of the Ego: A Minimal and Generative Structural Model. [Preprint].